S No
|
Government’s proposal
|
|
Citizens proposal
|
1.
|
Lokpal
will not have any power to either initiate action suo motu in any
case or even receive complaints of corruption from general public.
The general public will make complaints to the speaker of Lok Sabha
or chairperson of Rajya Sabha. Only those complaints forwarded by
Speaker of Lok Sabha/ Chairperson of Rajya Sabha to Lokpal would be
investigated by Lokpal. This not only severely restricts the
functioning of Lokpal, it also provides a tool in the hands of the
ruling party to have only those cases referred to Lokpal which
pertain to political opponents (since speaker is always from the
ruling party). It will also provide a tool in the hands of the
ruling party to protect its own politicians.
|
|
Lokpal
will have powers to initiate investigations suo moto in any case
and also to directly entertain complaints from the public. It will
not need reference or permission from anyone to initiate
investigation into any case. Jago Party wants to add that
\" All anonymous complaints must be also investigated. There is
no need for complainant to reveal his / her identity. Bribe is
always collected by forcing innocent people, so bribe giver
should not be held guilty\"
|
2
|
Lokpal
has been proposed to be an advisory body. Lokpal, after enquiry in
any case, will forward its report to the competent authority. The
competent authority will have final powers to decide whether to
take action on Lokpal’s report or not. In the case of cabinet
ministers, the competent authority is Prime Minister. In the case
of PM and MPs the competent authority is Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha,
as the case may be. In the coalition era when the government of the
day depends upon the support of its political partners, it will be
impossible for the PM to act against any of his cabinet ministers
on the basis of Lokpal’s report. For instance, if there were such a
Lokpal today and if Lokpal made a recommendation to the PM to
prosecute A. Raja, obviously the PM will not have the political
courage to initiate prosecution against A. Raja. Likewise, if
Lokpal made a report against the PM or any MP of the ruling party,
will the house ever pass a resolution to prosecute the PM or the
ruling party MP? Obviously, they will never do that.
|
|
Lokpal
is not an advisory body. It will have the powers to initiate
prosecution against any one after completion of investigations in
any case. It will also have powers to order disciplinary
proceedings against any government servant.
|
3
|
The bill
is legally unsound. Lokpal has not been given police powers.
Therefore Lokpal cannot register an FIR. Therefore all the
enquiries conducted by Lokpal will tantamount to “preliminary
enquiries”. Even if the report of Lokpal is accepted, who will file
the chargesheet in the court? Who will initiate prosecution? Who
will appoint the prosecution lawyer? The entire bill is silent on
that.
|
|
Lokpal
would have police powers. It will be able to register FIR, proceed
with criminal investigations and launch prosecution.
|
4
|
The bill
does not say what will be the role of CBI after this bill. Can CBI
and Lokpal investigate the same case or CBI will lose its powers to
investigate politicians? If the latter is true, then this bill is
meant to completely insulate politicians from any investigations
whatsoever which are possible today through CBI.
|
|
That
part of CBI, which deals with cases of corruption, will be merged
into Lokpal so that there is just one effective and independent
body to take action against corruption.
|
5
|
There is
a strong punishment for “frivolous” complaints. If any complaint is
found to be false and frivolous, Lokpal will have the power to send
the complainant to jail through summary trial but if the complaint
were found to be true, the Lokpal will not have the power to send
the corrupt politicians to jail! So the bill appears to be meant to
browbeat, threaten and discourage those fighting against
corruption.
|
|
Deterrence
has been provided against frivolous complaints in the form of
financial penalties against the complainant, however, Lokayukta is
empowered to prosecute the corrupt and take disciplinary action
against them.
|
6
|
Lokpal
will have jurisdiction only on MPs, ministers and PM. It will not
have jurisdiction over officers. The officers and politicians do
not indulge in corruption separately. In any case of corruption,
there is always an involvement of both of them. So according to
government’s proposal, every case would need to be investigated by
both CVC and Lokpal. So now, in each case, CVC will look into the
role of bureaucrats while Lokpal will look into the role of
politicians. Obviously the case records will be with one agency and
the way government functions it will not share its records with the
other agency. It is also possible that in the same case the two agencies
arrive at completely opposite conclusions. Therefore it appears to
be a sure way of killing any case.
|
|
Lokpal
will have jurisdiction over politicians, officials and judges. CVC
and the entire vigilance machinery of government will be merged
into Lokpal.
|
7
|
Lokpal
will consist of three members, all of them being retired judges.
There is no reason why the choice should be restricted to
judiciary. By creating so many post retirement posts for judges,
the government will make the retiring judges vulnerable to
government influences just before retirement as is already
happening in the case of retiring bureaucrats. The retiring judges,
in the hope of getting post retirement employment would do the
bidding of the government in their last few years.
|
|
Lokpal
would have ten members and one Chairperson. Out of them four need
to have legal background (they need not be judges). Others could be
from any background.
|
8
|
The
selection committee consists of Vice President, PM, Leaders of both
houses, Leaders of opposition in both houses, Law Minister and Home
minister. Barring Vice President, all of them are politicians whose
corruption Lokpal is supposed to investigate. So there is a direct
conflict of interest. Also selection committee is heavily loaded in
favor of the ruling party. Effectively ruling party will make the
final selections. And obviously ruling party will never appoint
strong and effective Lokpal.
|
|
Selection
committee consists of members from judicial background, Chief
Election Commissioner, Comptroller and Auditor General of India and
international awardees (like Nobel prize winners and Magsaysay
awardees of Indian origin). A detailed transparent and
participatory selection process has been prescribed.
|
9
|
Lokpal
will not have powers to investigate any case against PM, which
deals with foreign affairs, security and defence. This means that
corruption in defence deals will be out of any scrutiny whatsoever.
It will become impossible to investigate into any Bofors in future.
|
|
There is
no such bar on Lokpal’s powers.
|
10
|
Whereas
a time limit of six months to one year has been prescribed for
Lokpal to enquire, however, subsequently, there is no time limit
prescribed for completion of trial.
|
|
Investigations
should be completed within one year. Trial should get over within
the next one year.
|
11
|
It does
not deal with corruption of Bureaucrats. Corrupt bureaucrats
continue in their job without any actions against them.
|
|
Lokpal
will have power to direct disciplinary action, including dismissal
of a corrupt officer from job.
|
12
|
It does
not talk of investigation of complaints against judges
|
|
Lokpal
will have powers to initiate investigations on complaints of
corruption against judges.
|
13
|
Speaker
would decide which complaints shall be enquired into by Lokpal.
|
|
Lokpal
will not be able to dismiss any complaint from public without
hearing the complainant.
|
14
|
Our
entire governance system suffers from inadequate public grievance
redressal systems, which force people to pay bribes. Lokpal bill
does not address this issue.
|
|
Lokpal
will have the powers to orders redressal in a time bound manner. It
will have powers to impose financial penalties on guilty officers,
which would be paid to complainant as compensation.
|
15
|
Large
number of people raising their voice against political corruption
are being murdered. Lokpal does not have any powers to provide
protection to them.
|
|
Lokpal
will have powers to provide protection against physical and
professional victimization of whistleblowers.
|
16
|
Nothing has been provided in law to recover
ill gotten wealth. A corrupt person can come out of jail and enjoy
that money.
|
|
Loss caused to the government due to
corruption will be recovered from all accused.
|
17
|
Under the present law, there is Small
punishment for corruption- Punishment for corruption is minimum 6
months and maximum 7 years.
|
|
Enhanced punishment - The punishment would be
minimum 5 years and maximum of life imprisonment. Jago
Party wants that maximum punishment should be \" DEATH\"
|